I gotta admit straight out --I robbed this.Well... sort of.
After editing for spelling, punctuation, grammatical errors, run on sentences, incomplete thoughts and a WHOLE LOT of rewrites... I may as well have written it.
The headline was even wrong; ‘WHOSE,’ not ‘WHO’S.’
And, of course, I HAVE TO ADD the cartoons! The basic idea is here, though.
Politically, Obama Obimbo* is about as coordinated as a monkey humping a football covered in Crisco.
On one hand, you’ve got these Wall Street protests that ObamaObimbo* supports because he’s anti-capitalist, anti-American and anti-Big Business.
Then, you’ve got Obama Obimbo* supporting the unions who called for violence against the Tea Party.
Then, AGAIN, you’ve got Obama Obimbo* claiming he’s on the side of the little guy; that’s what all of his political rhetoric has been about. Never mind that a bunch of idiots voted for him AFTER he said that his plan would produce “no more” than 8% unemployment (translation: “I’m going to create unemployment.”)
You’ve ALSO got the Obama Obimbo* who wants collection agencies to be able to call cell phones to force people to pay their debts because that is what would help the economy.
Who’s Whose* side is this guy on? I thought Big Business was the problem with them taking money from the little guy!
I thought we were supposed to get everything for free. Lets recap: you won’t have to worry about gas in your car or paying your house mortgage -- probably because you won’t have a car or a house to mortgage. So, here you go...
I’m not even that astute a political commentator, but this guy, Obama Obimbo,* just makes it too easy.
Everything in my military mind tells me that the Tea Party has no intention of becoming a third political party. At least, I hope not! This would all but guarantee that Obimbo (or, someone like him) would continue to reign -- or, rain -- over America.
What the Tea Party HAS DONE is to wake us up -- hopefully.
Will it never end?!
You would think that in an off election year, the onslaught of media attacks against the Tea Party would have subsided. Instead, they’ve picked up steam. Just this week, the stalwart mouthpiece for liberalism in America, The New York Times, published an article titled "Crashing the Tea Party.” The article was meant to serve a dual purpose: to discredit the Tea Party as just an unpopular wing of the Republican Party, and for the two authors to hawk their book that bashes Conservative values.
It’s a free country, and they certainly have every right to sell their book to the left-wing radicals who regularly read The New York Times. But these attacks against the Tea Party are the only tools liberals have left in their belts to combat us!
Now, for the good part!
Attorneys have a saying: when the facts are against you, argue the law; when the law is against you, argue the facts; and when they’re both against you, call the other guy names. Liberals in this country have adapted that perfectly to the political forum!
They lose on the facts -- when Obama took control of Congress, the average gas price in this country was $1.79. Now it’s $3.59. In January 2009, the unemployment rate was 7.6%. Now it’s 9.2%. And the national debt was at about $10.7 trillion when Obama took office. Today, it’s $14.6 trillion. The facts have spoken, and the liberal agenda is wreaking havoc on this country’s economy!
When the DemocRATS took control of Congress DURING THE FINAL YEARS THAT BUSH WAS IN OFFICE, it was like letting a bunch of teenage girls out at the mall with unlimited access to their daddies’ credit cards. It’s been that way ever since.
They also lose on the law: this country was founded on the US Constitution, yet Barack Obama and his liberal allies continue to disregard the Constitution and its principles. Obama has sent US troops on an extended mission to Libya without Congressional approval, he forced his unconstitutional healthcare scheme through Congress, and he continually runs around the Conservatives in Congress on things like “Fast and Furious” and immigration enforcement. Liberals lose on the law as well.
So where does that leave us? They call us names!
This New York Times piece is just the most recent in a long line of attacks against you and the rest of the Tea Party movement. We’re not racists, hate-mongerers, or hobbits, but that won’t stop those who are losing the argument from trying to undermine us!
This is why we’re launching our “We are the Tea Party” PR campaign. Between John Kerry telling us we don’t deserve a right to have our voices heard, John McCain calling us hobbits, and The New York Times saying we’re nothing but a divisive, unpopular wing of the Republican Party, we’ve been attacked from every angle!
If we fail to expose the distortions being spread about who we are, we’ll be unable to recruit new patriots to our cause. In politics, a movement that is not growing, is dying.
America cannot afford to lose the only voice of sanity in politics -- the Tea Party!
“A divisive, unpopular wing of the Republican Party?” Yeah, I guess you could call them that, if you’re the one who has been sent to DC to do a man’s job and then weenie out.
If not the Tea Party, just WHO will hold these politicians accountable? And, if it’s not NOW, we won’t have to worry about WHEN.
The “buffer zone” parcel at the Obama family mansion in Chicago’s upscale Kenwood neighborhood purchased by the wife of convicted felon Tony Rezko was transferred to Barack and Michelle Obama without ever being assessed or taxed, in apparent violation of Illinois law, according to a debt-collection expert.
“The Cook County Assessor’s Office told me that there is no record of any tax assessment having been done on this transfer of the buffer zone property into a Northern Trust Co. Deed in Trust,” Albert Hendershot told WND.
Hendershot, president and owner of Innovative Portfolio Recovery Inc, a debt collection and skip tracing company based in Birmingham, Ala., noted the buffer zone “does not have an address attached to it, which is probably how the assessment and tax were avoided.”
Reid sat down with more than 30 Review-Journal staffers Friday afternoon for an hour-long Q&A session at the newspaper’s offices. The bulk of the back and forth was dedicated to federal spending and how Congress might tame exploding budget deficits.
Reid blamed everything that ails Washington and the nation on Republicans. He slammed the GOP for its refusal to go along with tax increases as part of this month’s debt-ceiling deal, saying hard-core fiscal conservatives are making it impossible to strike a long-term deal that slows the growth of the national debt.
“(Senate Minority Leader) Mitch McConnell has done a good job bringing the country to a standstill,” Reid said.
Mercifully, no one on the Review-Journal staff asked Reid about green energy.
There it was: 39 percent. Floor broke. Threshold crossed. The close of Barack Obama’s awful week. One more awful August. On Sunday, for the first time of his presidency, Obama’s public approval rating dipped below 40 percent in the Gallup Poll.
Now polls are like life. The older one becomes, the less remarkable the ebbs and flows become. Or the longer the trend line, the smaller the blips seem. But some poll numbers capture more. Gallup has an innate symbolism. As gold standards do. And 39 percent is emblematic of that oldest incumbent problem: selling hard times.
The poll bookends an historically bad week. The atmospherics presidents dread. There is the mercurial stock market, trending more down than up. Last week, consumer sentiment hit its lowest point since the dusk of Jimmy Carter’s presidency.
