31 July 2012

Yo, Dawg...

Saturday is Obimbo’s birthday (supposedly -- since he's got no papers, I guess he can have a birthday anytime he wants to have one.) The First Wookie sent out an e-mail asking everyone to sign his birthday card. (Yeah, like I’d sign it... when hell freezes over and monkeys fly out my butt.) To top it off, Obimbo’s sent his own email inviting his fellow trolls to put their name in a raffle to have a chance to join him at his birthday party. (Can’t wait for THAT one.)

I got a better idea.

A BIRTHDAY CAKE for the little cur-bitch (cause he sho ain't no MALE dawg!) 

So, here goes...



First, we take a cake that one of his mamas' has done already baked up for his sorry ass, and we gonna decorate it...
like this...

and we GOTTA put the candles on it...

and there you got it -- the PERFECT birthday cake for the PERFECT DAWG-ASS IDIOT... and it’s made from 100% dawg meat!

When I celebrate my dog's birthday, at least I know when it is -- she's got papers.

And I'm positive that I won't be thinking of you this Saturday, Dawg, you miserable pile of dawg manure.

27 July 2012

Why Mitt Romney Is Unlikeable!

I just received this from my friend and commentor, JonBerg; you may have seen it somewhere else, but here it is again: 
A lot is being said in the media about Mitt Romney not being “likable” or that he doesn’t “relate well” to people. Here’s a Top Ten List to explain this “unlikablility.”
Just for the record:
His full name: Willard Mitt Romney. 
He was born: March 12, 1947 and is 65 years old.
His father: George W. Romney, former Governor of the State of Michigan. 
He was raised in Bloomfield Hills, Michigan. 
He is married to Ann Romney. They wed in 1969 and have five children. 
Education: B.A. from Brigham Young University, J.D. and M.B.A. from Harvard University. 
Religion: Mormon -- The Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints. 
Working Background: After high school, he spent 30 months in France as a Mormon missionary. 
After going to both Harvard Business School and Harvard Law School simultaneously, he passed the Michigan bar exam, but never worked as an attorney. (He has my vote right there!) 
In 1984, he co-founded Bain Capital a private equity investment firm, one of the largest such firms in the United States. 
In 1994, he ran for Senator of  Massachusetts and lost to Ted Kennedy. (That was Massachusetts’ loss.) 
He was President and CEO of the 2002 Winter Olympic Games. 
In 2002, he was elected Governor of the State of Massachusetts where he eliminated a 1.5 billion deficit. 
Some interesting facts about Romney:
Bain Capital, starting with one small office supply store in Massachusetts, turned it into Staples; now over 2,000 stores employing 90,000 people. 
Bain Capital also worked to perform the same kinds of business miracles again and again, with companies like Domino’s, Sealy, Brookstone, Weather Channel, Burger King, Warner Music Group, Dollarama and Home Depot Supply just to mention a few. 
He was an unpaid volunteer campaign worker for his father’s gubernatorial campaign for one year. 
He was an unpaid intern in his father’s governor’s office for eight years. 
He was an unpaid Bishop and Stake President of his church for ten years. 
He was an unpaid President of the Salt Lake Olympic Committee for three years. 
He took no salary and was the unpaid Governor of Massachusetts for four years. 
He gave his entire inheritance from his father to charity. 
Mitt Romney is one of the wealthiest self-made men in our country but has given more back to its citizens in terms of money, service and time than most men. 
In 2011, Mitt Romney gave over $4 million to charity, almost 19% of his income. For comparison purposes, Obama gave 1% and Joe Biden gave $300 or .0013%. 
Mitt Romney is trustworthy:
He will show us his birth certificate 
He will show us his high school and college transcripts. 
He will show us his social security card. 
He will show us his law degree. 
He will show us his draft notice. 
He will show us his medical records. 
He will show us his income tax records. 
He will show us he has nothing to hide. 
Mitt Romney’s background, experience and trustworthiness show him to be a great leader and an excellent citizen for President of the United States. 
You may think that Romney may not be the best representative the Republicans could have selected. 
At least I know what religion he is, and that he won’t desecrate the flag, bow down to foreign powers, or practice fiscal irresponsibility. 
I know he has the ability to turn around this financial debacle that the current regime has gotten us into. We won’t like all the things necessary to recover from this debt, but someone with Romney’s background can do it.
Now, on the minus side:
He never was a “Community Organizer,” never took drugs or smoked pot, never got drunk, did not associate with Communists or terrorists, nor did he attend a church whose pastor called for God to damn the United States of America.
Sheech... with a background like that, I will have to admit that Romney's gonna have a difficult time in politics.

24 July 2012

Screw Business As Usual…

A Fire And Brimstone Strategy.
This is so good, I can’t mess with it. Okay, I messed with it SOME and left a few things out. It was written by Craig Andresen of The National Patriot before we knew who the Republican presidential candidate would be, so I’ve made it in the present tense, too.


It’s going to be an ugly campaign. We all know it and we’re ready for it but it’s going to the ugliest and nastiest and dirtiest campaign in history. 
[So,] why NOT take the early lead? 
If [Romney] takes this advice, it will send a clear message to the Republican establishment that conservatives aren’t going to do business as usual any more. It would shake the establishment and pull together conservative voters. 
...[I]f ... Romney ... adopts this measure, HE would pull together the conservative vote. 
Here is a little something else this would do… it would shake the Obama campaign to its core. 
As soon as the 1,144 delegates are in hand, ... either at the convention or before… put this into motion. 
Rather than a leisurely march toward a VP nominee or a surprise VP announcement like we got in 2008, vet the possible VPs NOW and stand ready to announce the running mate in a nationally televised press conference the day after the delegates are in hand.

Make the VP choice… Allen West.
Having Congressman West in the VP slot makes him a TRIPLE THREAT and a VP who WILL redefine the role. Triple threat? As the Vice President he would attend to the regular duties and be a heartbeat away from the presidency. A Vice President West would also act as a second Secretary of State in difficult diplomatic negotiations. AND… a Vice President West would work in concert with the Secretary of Defense to realign our military and redefine its role. 
Triple threat. 
Oh, but this is just the START of the strategy! 
As soon as [Romney] has introduced West as the running mate…THE NOMINEE WOULD THEN INTRODUCE HIS SECRETARY OF STATE NOMINEE… 
John Bolton. As a former Ambassador to the United Nations there is nobody with a better handle on the world’s issues or more familiar with the players. John Bolton is tough, straight forward and not likely to appease ANYONE.
Now, you have the nominee on stage, the VP choice and the Secretary of State nominee… let’s not stop there.
Next to walk onto the stage… 
Sarah Palin… nominee for Secretary of Energy.
Palin’s directive… set us on the path toward energy independent in 10 years. Can you think of a better choice? Anyone more invested in that goal? Anyone who is more knowledgeable or adept? 
I don’t. 
Can you feel the ground starting to shake? 
Next out of the wings and onto the stage…
The nominee for Secretary of Defense. Enter… General David Petraeus.
As great as he was fighting a PC war… imagine what he’ll be like once he and West have pressed the reset button on our rules of engagement. In Petraeus we will have a Secretary of Defense whose mission will be to win. PERIOD. 
Oh, I’m not done yet… 
Next up… the nominee for Attorney General… Pam Bondi. 
Bondi is a no nonsense fighter who has taken on the current administration over Obamacare and WILL clean out the corruption rampant in that office today. 
Okay, where are we? Who is now standing on the stage? The nominee... Allen West… John Bolton… Sarah Palin… General Petreaus and Pam Bondi. 
How about a Secretary of the Treasury? We would need someone who has worked for YEARS in the tax field who understands the overwhelming burden of tax codes and who has, for years fought to restructure those codes. 
Welcome Michele Bachmann to the stage… the nominee for Secretary of the Treasury.
By now, fissures should be opening in the ground, rumbling coming from the sky and the faint odor of brimstone should be in the air.
We will need someone new… someone with new ideas to head up the Fed. 
Please welcome Ron Paul. Yes, I realize this, under Paul, will be a temporary position; but somehow, I doubt Ron Paul wants to make a career of running the Fed. 
Secretary of the Interior? Governor Bobby Jindal… COME ON DOWN!!!!! 
And finally…We need someone to head up the Department of Homeland Security. We must have someone who understands the issues we face. Someone who has worked in federal law enforcement. Someone who won’t take any crap from anybody. 
Please… a round of applause for… Sheriff Joe Arpaio.
Feel free to substitute names… add your own choices, but these are mine. The picks are only a part of the whole picture however. The impact is as important as the names.
Were the GOP nominee to do this… call a press conference and make such an announcement… It would be unprecedented. Never before has a presidential nominee entered the full on campaign with a fully assembled team. 
Can you even IMAGINE the shock-and-awe wave which would be sent through the Obama campaign were the GOP nominee to do this? 
Think about it. 
From the word GO it would be unlike any previous presidential campaign.
Instead of simply [Romney] against Obama we would have [Romney] vs Obama… Congressman Allen West vs Joe Biden… John Bolton vs Hillary Clinton… Sarah Palin vs Stephen Chu… General Petreaus vs Leon Panetta… Pam Bondi vs Eric Holder… Michele Bachmann vs Tim Geitner... Ron Paul vs Ben Bernake… Bobby Jindal vs Ken Salazar and Sheriff Joe Arpaio vs Janet Napolitano.
Think about that…Let that sink in…All campaigning at once. There would be no way out for Obama as each and every key player on his team would be exposed and held to account from the word GO. It would be a full on frontal assault and Obama would have no place to hide.
By adopting this proposal, Obama would be forced into a pot of boiling water or into the fire. If he tried to rid himself of baggage he would be exposed of running from his own record and that of the very people he’s been standing behind for political expediency. If he stays with them, he would be forced to defend them. Boiling water or a raging fire… his choice. 
It’s bold, brash and completely against the establishment business as usual strategy. 
It’s earth shaking. 
An entire assembled team of key cabinet positions…Each one a pitbull on a T-Bone… hammering their liberal counterparts on every issue, every day, from the word GO until November 6th, 2012. 
We will have to play the cards we’re dealt with [Romney,] but tell me THIS strategy wouldn’t go a LONG way toward bringing the conservative voters together. Tell me this strategy wouldn’t pull in and appeal to independents. 
As voters, using THIS strategy, we would be voting for the whole team rather than just the standard, business-as-usual Presidential 2-person ticket. 
Feel free to insert your own cabinet choices and explanations in the comments below -- but whatever you do…
SHARE THIS ARTICLE... FAR AND WIDE!

20 July 2012

LOST (Law Of The Sea Treaty) Is Where It Should Be... At DEEP SIX And LOST!

From politicalvelcraft.org
Obama’s U.N. Treaty Defeated & Officially Dead In The Water: (Law Of The Sea Treaty) Violates U.S. Constitution!

Well this is a relief. Jim DeMint’s website has announced that the Law of the Sea Treaty (and eco-nut treaty) is officially dead. It takes 67 senators to ratify a treaty, and with 34 senators opposing, the treaty has no chance of making it out of the Senate. 
With 34 senators against the misguided treaty, LOST will not be ratified by the Senate this year. 
Strong opposition is rising in the U.S. Senate to the U.N.’s Law of the Sea Treaty (LOST) that would subjugate American sovereignty to the whims of an international tribunal. To date, 30 Republican senators have signed onto a letter opposing LOST. It takes 67 votes to approve treaties in the Senate, so only 34 votes are needed to ensure defeat of this misguided treaty. 
Why is LOST so harmful? 
  • It would act as a backdoor Kyoto Protocol, forcing us into cap and trade policies that would destroy jobs and harm our economy. 
  • It would cost the U.S. trillions of dollars in international royalties to nations including state sponsors of terror like Sudan and “socialistic, despotic or brutal governments in Belarus, Burma, China or Zimbabwe.” 
  • Former U.S. ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton warned it would embolden China, “constrain U.S. naval activities, and do nothing to resolve China’s expansive maritime territorial claims.”
  • Radical environmental groups have lined up in support of LOST.
  • President Ronald Reagan strongly opposed the treaty as a threat to U.S. sovereignty.
And the above reasons are just for starters!
For months, conservatives across the country have been calling and emailing their Senators in an effort to push them to oppose this UN treaty. Since then, a steady stream of Senators have come out in opposition to the dangerously-flawed treaty. 
Thanks to the dedication of conservatives..., thousands of phone calls went into offices of the Senators who had not yet signed onto the letter. And thanks to those calls, the final six Senators needed to stop the treaty indicated their opposition. 
President Obama and Senator John Kerry tried to hand over America’s sovereignty, but because of the hard work of grassroots conservatives..., our nation and economic future are more secure. 

Below is a list of Senators who have signed the letter or otherwise stated opposition:

And, as always, on the horizon is the ever-present UN’s “Let’s Legislate Gun Control In The Whole Friggin Galaxy.” On July 27th, with his ever-faithful side-kick, Hildegard “Hell on Earth” Clinton, Obimbo intends to sign a United Nations treaty that will legislate gun control in the United States and effectively repeal our Second Amendment. 

Guess again, all you Carters, Obimbos, Clintons and the rest of you New World Order nest of maggots that are out there sucking up good oxygen...

This is what stands in front of the UN and it makes me want to puke:

So, this would be my answer to the UN and anyone else who thinks I’ll give up my weapons:

How the hell we ever got involved with the UN is beyond me... OH!... Wait a minute... I remember, now!

Pardon me while I go toss my cookies. I always do that when I think of Liberal-Ass Democrats.

16 July 2012

Ask Harry Reid About Chinese Solar Panels.

I’m going to take the day off from bashing Obimbo. Yeah, it’s a hard thing to do, but I’m going to let Todd Cefaratti of The Tea Party.Net bash the second best person that I take great pleasure in despising... Harry Reid. Actually, it’s a close tie between Reid and Pelosi, but Reid’s got it today.
OK, the uniforms the US Olympic Team will be wearing in the London Games were made in China. They were not paid for with tax dollars but instead by Ralph Lauren who designed them and had them produced in one of his factories. It would have been nice to have them made here but thanks to overreaching unions, America really does not have much of a garment industry left. 
In an obvious pandering play to the union powers, Harry Reid was “outraged” by such a travesty. “The USOC should be embarrassed, they should be humiliated. ... Our athletes should not wear clothes manufactured in China.” He went on to say, “they should be placed in a pile and burned”. 
Forget for a moment how you feel about the uniform issue itself and consider Reid’s record on foreign manufacturing.  
Fact 1. The government gave now bankrupt solar panel manufacturer, Solyndra, nearly half a billion dollars for nothing. 
Fact 2. When Harry Reid pushed through funding and sweetheart land deals for a huge solar power generating facility near his home town in Nevada, the solar panels were purchased from his good friend, and Chinese manufacturing billionaire, Wang Yusuo. You guessed it, the panels installed in Nevada were made in China! 
I am sure it is a mere coincidence that Harry Reid’s son, Rory Reid, is employed as a lobbyist for the solar venture!
No need to thank me, folks. My duty and I saw it. I KNEW the lamestream media wouldn’t touch a story like this.

15 July 2012

And They Want 12 Years Of Romney’s Tax Returns?


Mystery seems to be a generational thing. Nearly a dozen aliases and at least two different Social Security numbers (with upwards of over 99 separate addresses) have been found for Ann Dunham, Obimbo’s mother. She did work for the ultra-liberal Ford Foundation and she may have earned some income from pornographic poses. The only real thing researchers have been able to find out about Obimbo’s mother is that she had close ties (smirk, smirk) to Frank Marshall Davis... and the fact she made porn. I’m pretty sure that’s a first for presidential mothers.

12 July 2012

Sometimes Silence Is Golden.

Greg Mankiw (a professor of economics at Harvard University) didn’t write a word on his blog -- he just put this graph up:
Note: The shaded area indicates the recession; everything to the right of that is the “recovery.”

Sometimes silence is just flat-ass GOLDEN, Professor Mankiw.

So, I guess this is what Obimbo and the Detroit / Washington Mob meant when they said we’re moving in the right direction.  I also remember a lot of  “we shouldn’t read too much into the data.
June 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is informative to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/07/06/employment-situation-june 
May 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/06/01/employment-situation-may 
April 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/05/04/employment-situation-april 
March 2012: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, and it is helpful to consider each report in the context of other data that are becoming available.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/04/06/employment-situation-march 
February 2012: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/03/09/employment-situation-february 
January 2012: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report; nevertheless, the trend in job market indicators over recent months is an encouraging sign.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/02/03/employment-situation-january 
December 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2012/01/06/employment-situation-december
November 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/12/02/employment-situation-november 
October 2011: “The monthly employment and unemployment numbers are volatile and employment estimates are subject to substantial revision. There is no better example than August’s jobs figure, which was initially reported at zero and in the latest revision increased to 104,000. This illustrates why the Administration always stresses it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/11/04/employment-situation-october 
September 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/10/07/employment-situation-september 
August 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/09/02/employment-situation-august 
July 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/08/05/employment-situation-july 
June 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/07/08/employment-situation-june 
May 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/06/03/employment-situation-may 
April 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/05/06/employment-situation-april 
March 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/04/01/employment-situation-march 
February 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/03/04/employment-situation-february 
January 2011: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.” (LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/02/04/employment-situation-january) 
December 2010: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2011/01/07/employment-situation-december  
November 2010: “Therefore, as the Administration always stresses, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/12/03/employment-situation-november  
October 2010: “Given the volatility in monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/11/05/employment-situation-october  
September 2010: “Given the volatility in the monthly employment and unemployment data, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/10/08/employment-situation-september 
July 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.  It is essential that we continue our efforts to move in the right direction and replace job losses with robust job gains.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/08/06/employment-situation-july 
August 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/09/03/employment-situation-august 
June 2010: “As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/07/02/employment-situation-june 
May 2010: “As always, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/06/04/employment-situation-may 
April 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/05/07/employment-situation-april 
March 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/04/02/employment-situation-march 
January 2010: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2010/02/05/employment-situation-january 
November 2009: “Therefore, it is important not to read too much into any one monthly report, positive or negative.”  LINK: http://www.whitehouse.gov/blog/2009/12/04/employment-situation-november


I’ll admit that I'm not the smartest in math and I have a hard time trying to balance a check book... but even I can look at the graph and tell you that there seems to be a definite pattern here. THEREFORE, it MIGHT BE kinda IMPORTANT, don’t ya think?”

I have another question -- HOW THE HELL DO THESE PEOPLE SLEEP AT NIGHT?!

07 July 2012

So Much For Obama Being The Intelligent One.

Obama: Confused About The Declaration (among other things.) 
By DAN RIEHL (breitbart.com)
Former President George W. Bush endured any number of insults to his intelligence while in office. It didn’t matter that he had graduated from both Yale and Harvard, worked in business, ran a Major League Baseball enterprise, or successfully served as a Texas Governor before being elected to a second term with a recording-breaking 69% of the vote. He was forever branded the dim bulb and hick from Texas, out of his league in the Oval Office. 
But that Barack Obama, he was the real deal -- a Constitutional scholar, despite his never actually having performed as one. Obama was just another Chicago machine politician before being elected president.

Given recent comments he made from the White House, Obama’s not much of a student of History, or human rights, either. '"In his remarks, Obama suggested that the Declaration (of Independence) was the first time the God-given rights of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness had been "put to paper.'" 
While we may all love and embrace the recently celebrated Declaration of Independence, what Obama said of it simply isn't true. It's not even close. 
As it's primary author, Thomas Jefferson, acknowledged, the Declaration was never intended to be based upon original thinking ... or writing. It was meant to express the "American mind," developed from and based upon centuries of thinking and writing, all of it well documented and commonly known. 
As Jefferson wrote in 1825, "'All its authority rests then on the harmonizing sentiments of the day, whether expressed in conversation, in letters, printed essays, or in the elementary books of public right, as Aristotle, Cicero, Locke, Sidney, &c.'" 
What it simply was not is the first time the God given rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness were ever "put to paper," as Barack Obama more than implied. 
Just like Chris Matthews, when I read the following, I get 'this thrill going up my leg' -- 
So much for the notion liberals would have Americans believe, that we’ve finally elected some genius who can make all their big government plans and schemes work, despite their having failed miserably every time they’ve been tried by governments anywhere in the present, or past.
I don’t give Obimbo credit for many things. Hell, I don’t give him credit for ANYTHING! But, I will give Numbnuts credit for this... Obimbo’s got to be America’s quickest fucker-upper.